Wednesday , July 28 2021
Home / Bruegel Think Thank / A rushed deal or a rush to judgement?

A rushed deal or a rush to judgement?

Summary:
The Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) is supposed to improve market access for European companies operating in China and to ensure a level playing field, as well as reciprocity. Does it fulfil such expectations? On 30 November 2020 after over 7 years of talks, the European Union and China concluded negotiations for a Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI for short). The agreement is intended to increase investment between the EU and China by establishing a legal framework and common rules on issues ranging from state-owned enterprises to subsidy transparency and rules against the forced transfer of technologies. The deal replaces more than two dozen bilateral investment treaties between the EU’s 27 member states and China, improving market access for European companies

Topics:
The Sound of Economics considers the following as important: , , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

A. G.-H. writes Why China should fear the EU’s carbon border tax

The Sound of Economics writes Are robots taking our jobs?

Anne Bucher and Guntram B. Wolff writes Increasing the global supply of essential medical supplies: Time for Europe to step up its global leadership

André Sapir writes The European Union’s carbon border mechanism and the WTO

The Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) is supposed to improve market access for European companies operating in China and to ensure a level playing field, as well as reciprocity. Does it fulfil such expectations?

On 30 November 2020 after over 7 years of talks, the European Union and China concluded negotiations for a Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI for short).

The agreement is intended to increase investment between the EU and China by establishing a legal framework and common rules on issues ranging from state-owned enterprises to subsidy transparency and rules against the forced transfer of technologies. The deal replaces more than two dozen bilateral investment treaties between the EU’s 27 member states and China, improving market access for European companies operating — or intending to operate — in China and ensuring a level playing field and reciprocity when they do.

Does the agreement actually live up to the above claims and seven years of expectation? To help us find out, in this episode of the Sound of Economics Giuseppe Porcaro is joined by Bert Hofman, the director of the East Asian Institute at National University of Singapore and Bruegel’s China expert Alicia García-Herrero, for a in depth commentary and glance at what the detail of the deal means for Europe.

Relevant publications:

Demertzis, M. (2021) ‘An EU – China investment deal: a second look’ 19 January

García-Herrero, A. (2021) ‘Europe’s disappointing investment deal with China‘ 4 January

Sound Money Economics System was a fringe political party in Manitoba, Canada, during the provincial election of 1941.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *