Saturday , October 23 2021
Home / Bruegel Think Thank / Letter: ‘Strategic autonomy’ is now an EU catchphrase

Letter: ‘Strategic autonomy’ is now an EU catchphrase

Summary:
Strategic autonomy should not be an illusionary search for independence, but rather a strategic management of interdependence, based on diversification of supply chains. By: Simone Tagliapietra Date: March 24, 2021 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance This Letter was originally published in the Financial Times in response to an opinion by Philip Stephens on supply chain ‘sovereignty’. Philip Stephens’ article “Supply chain ‘sovereignty’ will undo the gains of globalisation” (Opinion, March 19) rightly draws attention to the danger of the search for national “resilience” — or “strategic autonomy”, as we say in Brussels — turning into protectionism. Over the past two years, strategic autonomy has become one of the most utilised catchphrases in European policy circles.

Topics:
Simone Tagliapietra considers the following as important: , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

M. D. writes Letter: Declining investment may explain why rates are low

The Sound of Economics writes A green fiscal pact

M. D. writes Monetary arithmetic and inflation risk

M. D. writes The pandemic’s uncertain impact on productivity

Strategic autonomy should not be an illusionary search for independence, but rather a strategic management of interdependence, based on diversification of supply chains.

By: Date: March 24, 2021 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

This Letter was originally published in the Financial Times in response to an opinion by Philip Stephens on supply chain ‘sovereignty’.

Letter: ‘Strategic autonomy’ is now an EU catchphrase

Philip Stephens’ article “Supply chain ‘sovereignty’ will undo the gains of globalisation” (Opinion, March 19) rightly draws attention to the danger of the search for national “resilience” — or “strategic autonomy”, as we say in Brussels — turning into protectionism.

Over the past two years, strategic autonomy has become one of the most utilised catchphrases in European policy circles. Politicians have increasingly stressed the need for introducing measures to boost Europe’s strategic sovereignty in a number of areas — spanning defence to digital, pharmaceuticals to green projects. The idea is to “avoid external dependencies in a new geopolitical context”, to use the words of Thierry Breton, the European commissioner for the internal market.

However, the concept of “strategic autonomy” still remains vaguely defined. Clarity is needed here, because — as Stephens says — there truly is a fine line between autonomy and autarky.

Going back to Power and Interdependence by Joseph Nye and Robert O Keohane could be helpful. As they wrote in 1977: “We live in an era of interdependence.” There is nothing we can do to reverse this. What we can do is understand the variety of ways in which asymmetrical interdependence can be manipulated as a source of power and adopt sensible strategies to manage these manipulations.

Simone Tagliapietra
Simone Tagliapietra is an expert in international energy and climate issues, with a record of numerous publications covering the European energy markets, the EU energy and climate policy and the Euro-Mediterranean energy relations, with a particular focus on Turkey. He holds a PhD in Institutions and Policies from the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore in Milan, where he currently collaborates with the Department of International Economics, Institutions and Development.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *