Tuesday , October 22 2019
Home / Economistmeg / Germany Should End Austerity, Not Ireland

Germany Should End Austerity, Not Ireland

Summary:
Germany Should End Austerity, Not Ireland Anti-austerity fever is sweeping Europe as policy makers decide the way to get from crisis to growth involves higher spending. Well, not so fast. The fever has already spread to the highest levels. At the International Monetary Fund’s recent spring meetings in Washington, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde and her deputy, David Lipton, repeatedly urged euro-area countries to focus on investment rather than budget cuts. Then came the European Commission president, Jose Manuel Barroso, who said April 23 that austerity has reached the limits of political and social support. A day later, Italy’s prime minister designate, Enrico Letta, wasted no time declaring that “Europe’s policy of austerity is no longer sufficient.” The argument is compelling: Less retrenchment will allow more money to feed into the economy, which should support domestic investment and consumption, and so stimulate growth. That in turn should reduce budget deficits by increasing tax revenue, creating a virtuous circle. Yet easing austerity involves trade-offs that might not be worth making for the weaker euro-area economies. Paradoxically, it is healthier euro-area countries such as Germany, which aren’t considering a relaxation of austerity, that should do it. To read the rest, see the original piece on Bloomberg View.

Topics:
Megan Greene considers the following as important: , , , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Mathew Heim writes Questions to the Competition Commissioner-designate

M. G. writes Fed rate cuts won’t help

M. G. writes Fed shouldn’t use wages as beacon

M. G. writes ECB has the biggest bazooka

Germany Should End Austerity, Not Ireland

Anti-austerity fever is sweeping Europe as policy makers decide the way to get from crisis to growth involves higher spending. Well, not so fast.

The fever has already spread to the highest levels. At the International Monetary Fund’s recent spring meetings in Washington, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde and her deputy, David Lipton, repeatedly urged euro-area countries to focus on investment rather than budget cuts.

Then came the European Commission president, Jose Manuel Barroso, who said April 23 that austerity has reached the limits of political and social support. A day later, Italy’s prime minister designate, Enrico Letta, wasted no time declaring that “Europe’s policy of austerity is no longer sufficient.”

The argument is compelling: Less retrenchment will allow more money to feed into the economy, which should support domestic investment and consumption, and so stimulate growth. That in turn should reduce budget deficits by increasing tax revenue, creating a virtuous circle.

Yet easing austerity involves trade-offs that might not be worth making for the weaker euro-area economies. Paradoxically, it is healthier euro-area countries such as Germany, which aren’t considering a relaxation of austerity, that should do it.

To read the rest, see the original piece on Bloomberg View.

About M. G.
Megan Greene

Biography data hidden due GDPR Data Protection. Author consent pending.
(Economic Blogs is not responsible for linked external content)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *