Friday , April 28 2017
Home / On French Politics / Critique of French Polling Methods

Critique of French Polling Methods

Summary:
Political scientist Jean-Yves Dormagen criticizes the methods used by French pollsters, in particular their use of quotas based on gender, age, and socioeconomic status. All pollsters are obliged to "correct" their samples to compensate for non-randomness in survey responses, but Dormagen argues that the quotas employed in France are applied to categories that are too broad and unrepresentative.So beware of accepting the poll rankings (currently Macron no. 1, Le Pen 2, Mélenchon 3, and Fillon 4) as definitive. Big surprises may be in store. I'm making no bets on the outcome. Still biting my nails.

Topics:
Art Goldhammer considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

Art Goldhammer writes Le Non-Consigne de Mélenchon, The Virtue of Xavier Bertrand

Art Goldhammer writes Legislative Elections

Art Goldhammer writes This About Sums It Up

Art Goldhammer writes Excellent Electoral Maps.

Political scientist Jean-Yves Dormagen criticizes the methods used by French pollsters, in particular their use of quotas based on gender, age, and socioeconomic status. All pollsters are obliged to "correct" their samples to compensate for non-randomness in survey responses, but Dormagen argues that the quotas employed in France are applied to categories that are too broad and unrepresentative.

So beware of accepting the poll rankings (currently Macron no. 1, Le Pen 2, Mélenchon 3, and Fillon 4) as definitive. Big surprises may be in store. I'm making no bets on the outcome. Still biting my nails.

0 0
Art Goldhammer
Arthur Goldhammer (born 1946) is an American academic and translator. Goldhammer studied mathematics at MIT, gaining his PhD in 1973. Since 1977 he has worked as a translator. He is currently based at the Center for European Studies at Harvard.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *