Saturday , June 12 2021
Home / Political Thoughts - the magazine / Darwin, Lincoln, Churchill..why was the past racist?

Darwin, Lincoln, Churchill..why was the past racist?

Summary:
If we probe almost any life story before 1900 we can find evidence of racist speech and publications.  The mass media are busy stretching this discovery into "horrified" coverage of individuals from history but is it moral to single out individuals?  Should we allow the philistines to mount a new cultural revolution against all of history like the Maoists of the 1960s?There are two main reasons for the racism of the past.  The first is that races are a result of separate development in different countries and different parts of the world so that the existence of race is mostly a result of racism.  The second is that for almost two hundred years Europe was as different from tribal and less developed societies as aliens would be from humans today.I believe that the diversity of humanity is

Topics:
John considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

J. writes Got a new EV? Curing range anxiety and other issues.

J. writes The EU Shows why Brexit was necessary

J. writes The USA and UK are under attack

J. writes The “Trial” of Chauvin for the Death of George Floyd

If we probe almost any life story before 1900 we can find evidence of racist speech and publications.  The mass media are busy stretching this discovery into "horrified" coverage of individuals from history but is it moral to single out individuals?  Should we allow the philistines to mount a new cultural revolution against all of history like the Maoists of the 1960s?

There are two main reasons for the racism of the past.  The first is that races are a result of separate development in different countries and different parts of the world so that the existence of race is mostly a result of racism.  The second is that for almost two hundred years Europe was as different from tribal and less developed societies as aliens would be from humans today.

I believe that the diversity of humanity is its greatest achievement.  If we use the postmodern definition of race to include nations and cultures then the arts, customs and religions of our diverse races are extraordinary and wonderful.  This diversity is the result of the operation in the past of what would nowadays be called "racism": intermarriage with other races was frowned upon or forbidden and there have been times when most races would go as far as executing those who professed foreign ideas.

Darwin, Lincoln, Churchill..why was the past racist?
Diversity is our great achievement

 Given that the intense racism that ruled before 1900 was everywhere, a global phenomenon, it is odd that the mass media does not mention this.  

The current campaigns against racism are also campaigns against the diversity of nations.  Being proud of your country means that you, personally, believe that your country is a better place to live than other countries so, according to the postmodern definition of race, being proud of your country is being racist.  This exposes the current postmodern/postmarxist/neo-Maoist politics of the mass media for what it is: an attack on the nation state.  These attacks are almost entirely a Western phenomenon and especially an Anglo-American phenomenon, linked to the relative decline of Anglo-American power.  The attacks are partly financed by enemies of the West who are secure in their racist, fortress states such as Russia and China, partly financed by multi-national corporations and partly financed by the postmodern state media such as the BBC whose staff were indoctrinated at university.

Those who dream of global dominion such as Trotskyists like Tony Blair, Internationalists like Tony Hall and Multinational Banks and Corporations etc. are using race to further their ideals.  But do we want a world where everyone shares the same culture, economy and laws?  Do we want a world without diversity?

In fact the question is outside of our own wants and desires.  Any biological system that lacks diversity is doomed.  It cannot adapt to change because it does not contain the diversity within it to cope with the change.  Imagine a world where all the land was used for farming wheat, eventually a crop disease or a climatic transient etc. will destroy the crop globally and cause disaster, eventually the lack of terrestrial carbon sinks would cause disaster and so on.  Uniform systems are prone to catastrophe. As recently as 2008 the global financial system collapsed because it was so interconnected yet the globalists suppress the fact that they were to blame by removing "barriers".

The most immediate catastrophe that will afflict a globalised world without diversity is that a total surveillance state will cover everyone to prevent terrorism from those who want their own religion, ideas or nations.  We have already seen this in China where, to control their hitherto diverse empire, the Chinese have crushed all difference with technology.

These are perilous times and the lack of a mature overview of race in our mainstream media is the principle peril.  Postmodern races are the result of diversity and the ultimate racism is to destroy the source of this difference.  The challenge facing us is to devise methods by which the diverse nations of the world can coexist in peace, not to be so afraid of difference that we create a new imperium to ensure control.

Postscript: Cultural Revolution favoured by idiot children? Taking the knee? Both are straight out of the Maoist politics of 1968 China. It is no coincidence that BLM stands for Black Liberation Movement, a Maoist organisation used by China.

.


Darwin, Lincoln, Churchill..why was the past racist?
Taking the knee?

9/5/2021

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *